SEC536: Adversarial AI - Penetration Testing AI Systems

Virtual
TBD
Virtual
Virtual
Every military mission depends on operational technology (OT). Fuel, power, water, airfield lighting, and life safety systems are not support functions; they are mission prerequisites. Any asset that monitors, secures, engineers, or drives those control systems, and whose loss or exploitation would result in physical damage, safety hazards, or service outages—not just data loss. IT training often focuses on data integrity and confidentiality, while OT training emphasizes process safety, equipment protection, and operational continuity. Routine classroom and virtualized OT environments won’t enable skilled and ready cyber defenders – something new is needed now.
Keynote provides 3 successes to achieve and 3 pitfalls to avoid in developing the new OT cyber work role, Control Systems Security Specialist (Work Role 462): “Responsible for device, equipment, and system-level cybersecurity configuration and day-to-day security operations of control systems, including security monitoring and maintenance along with stakeholder coordination to ensure the system and its interconnections are secure in support of mission operations.” Session will confront questions no one has answered. How many of these defenders are needed to conduct operational testing? What is the right balance of OT knowledge and cyber response? How many to defend against a determined OT adversary? And is current training anywhere near sufficient?
OT is not IT. Its focus, priorities, metrics, and underlying systems differ, and so must its defenders. will show how clearly defined roles and mission-relevant training are what operationalize the Five ICS Cybersecurity Critical Controls, and what the DAF is building to close the gap between mission dependence and workforce readiness.
Virtual
Virtual
This fireside chat will focus on strengthening public sector cyber resilience as adversaries have moved beyond data theft and disruption toward impactful ransomware and bolder attacks with potential safety consequences in critical infrastructure including damage and destruction of engineering equipment. This session will highlight practical approaches for securing ICS/OT environments across all industrial sectors by leveraging the SANS Five ICS Cybersecurity Critical Controls, improving ICS/OT network visibility, industrial-grade incident response readiness and tabletop exercises, defensible control system network architecture, secure remote access, and risk-based control system vulnerability management. It will also address the cautious use of AI in government and critical infrastructure defense — recognizing AI’s value while managing its risks, limitations, and potential misuse by adversaries.
Virtual
As nation-state adversaries, cybercriminals, and AI-powered threats continue to evolve, government agencies must modernize their approach to threat management, balancing mission assurance, resilience, and security at machine speed. This presentation will cover:
Virtual
Join Ismael Valenzuela, SANS author and Senior Instructor, alongside Jon Clay, VP of Threat Intelligence at Trend AI, and Brian “Stretch” Meyer, Federal Field CTO at Axonius, for a fast-paced conversation on the identity battleground of 2026.
Zero Trust assumes you can verify every principal before granting access. In 2026 that assumption is under pressure from three directions at once. Attackers are weaponizing stolen identities and AI-driven tradecraft faster than human-paced response can keep up. Agentic AI is flooding the enterprise with non-human principals that authenticate cleanly but act autonomously. And government teams are still working to see, inventory, and govern the identities they already have.
This panel brings together threat intelligence and identity practitioners to examine where Zero Trust holds and where its operational model strains under machine-speed conditions. We will work through what changes when identity becomes the primary battleground: how attackers are exploiting the trust we extend to valid credentials, why visibility into every asset and identity is the prerequisite for every control that follows, and what defenders should prioritize when verification has to happen faster than a human can review it. Attendees will leave with a practical view of identity-centric Zero Trust built for the threats and the architectures of 2026.
Virtual
TBD
Virtual
Organizations face growing pressure to move beyond vulnerability discovery and into genuine risk reduction. Regulatory expectations like CISA's Binding Operational Directive BOD 26-04, which mandates risk-based prioritization and sets aggressive remediation timelines of three days for the highest-risk findings, are making one thing clear: the technology to support exposure management exists. The program’s maturity to sustain itself often does not.
This fireside chat explores what it actually takes to operationalize exposure management: moving from discovery to risk-informed decisions, closing the gap between prioritization and remediation, and the program capabilities organizations need to meet current and future requirements. Drawing on the Continuous Threat Exposure Management lifecycle and real-world implementation experience, this conversation gives security leaders a practical framework for turning compliance obligations and regulatory pressure into genuine, measurable risk reduction.
Virtual
Virtual