SEC536: Adversarial AI - Penetration Testing AI Systems


Experience SANS training through course previews.
Learn MoreLet us help.
Contact usBecome a member for instant access to our free resources.
Sign UpWe're here to help.
Contact UsMicrosoft has issued its September 2026 Patch Tuesday release, publishing security updates that address 974 vulnerabilities in its products. Two of the flaws are previously undisclosed and known to be exploited, both carrying CVSS score 7.8 and allowing an authorized local attacker to elevate privileges: CVE-2026-81963 stems from improper link resolution before file access in Windows Update Stack, and CVE-2026-85880 is a heap-based buffer overflow in Windows Advanced Local Procedure Call (ALPC). Both of these have been added to the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (CISA KEV). CrowdStrike assesses that 45% of the flaws addressed in this release involve privilege elevation, with the next largest categories being remote code execution at 26% and information disclosure at 18%; the remaining 11% is divided between denial of service, security feature bypass, spoofing, and tampering. Dustin Childs at the Zero Day Initiative highlights five other important flaws to prioritize: CVE-2026-55007, allowing remote code execution in Microsoft Exchange Server; CVE-2026-80097, allowing elevation of privilege in Microsoft Authenticator; CVE-2026-69465, allowing remote code execution in Microsoft Office SharePoint; CVE-2026-65669, allowing elevation of privilege in Microsoft SQL server; and CVE-2026-69525, allowing remote code execution in Remote Desktop Services. Childs indicates that 20 of the patched flaws could be classified as wormable. The SANS Internet Storm Center has published a full detailed list of this month’s flaws. The next largest Microsoft Patch Tuesday release to date was in July, addressing 622 CVEs — approximately five times the number in May and ten times the number in February.

Some users of Windows 11 25H2 are reporting authentication failures after applying KB5124008. It appears that a security fix to enforce stricter security features is incompatible with some older domain controllers (Windows Server 2019 — others may be affected as well). Mainstream support for Windows 2019 ended in 2024, but extended support, including security updates, should be available until 2029, so there is a chance that this will be fixed soon.

A Microsoft security release of this scale is a flashing neon sign that vulnerability management cannot remain a monthly spreadsheet exercise. Johannes' note about reports of authentication failures after KB5124008 is a perfect illustration: Patching at this volume is not simply a matter of finding and deploying updates; organizations need inventory, exposure context, prioritization, testing, staged deployment, validation, and rollback. Patch volume has become a systems problem. This is exactly the kind of pressure VulnOps is meant to handle. If your vulnerability management program still assumes a manageable monthly patch cycle, it's time to start looking seriously at VulnOps.

970 is a big number, and while that represents fixed flaws, it doesn't speak to exploitability. Hopefully you're saying that most of your systems are automatically applying these updates, and you're just going to verify that. Focus on the Windows Server updates as well as the ones for Exchange, SharePoint, and SQL server. Remind me again why those are still locally hosted — is the ROI still valid?
It's a massive month for patches as Microsoft clearly gets the hang of using AI for code analysis and fixes. You'll definitely want to triage the critical updates first, but don't leave any flaws behind; otherwise, attackers will just use AI to spin up automated exploits.

One may reasonably infer that the recent increase in the rate of patches is attributable to the application of AI. However, it also demonstrates the quality of our legacy code and the fragility of our infrastructure. One hopes to also see a corresponding and early decline in the number and cost of patches.
Microsoft
Zero Day Initiative
CrowdStrike
ISC
KrebsOnSecurity
Dark Reading
Ars Technica
The Register
BleepingComputer
SecurityWeek
Help Net Security
SAP has published security updates addressing 20 vulnerabilities in its products, including a maximum-severity flaw reported by Onapsis, dubbed "OVERPASS," that affects the SAP kernel through its processing of the Extended Passport (EPP). CVE-2026-44756, CVSS score 10.0, allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to run arbitrary OS commands on the SAP host with administrative privileges by crafting a network request with a malformed EPP header that exploits a memory safety vulnerability. Onapsis explains that "because EPP is processed as the session opens, every SAP control that decides who may do what, including user locks, roles, authorization objects and logon policies, is evaluated later than the point where the flaw is reached," and notes the difficulty of mitigation due to the EPP processing kernel code being used by more than one protocol, making it reachable from the internet-facing web layer, from the end users' SAP GUI layer, and from the RFC layer linking SAP systems together. The patch is the only definitive fix. Any SAP solution built on the SAP kernel inherits the flaw, including "SAP S/4HANA, SAP ERP and the SAP Business Suite (ECC), SAP NetWeaver Application Server ABAP, the SAP Web Dispatcher, SAP BW/4HANA, SAP Enterprise Portal, SAP PI/PO, SAP Solution Manager," and others. Onapsis recommends users first check their kernel release and patch level against the latest security note and determine possible exposure, building an accurate inventory. Internet-facing systems should be patched first, followed by internal systems, and users should work to reduce reachability and monitor for any exploitation attempts. The other three critical flaws addressed in the advisory are CVE-2026-58240, a missing authentication check in SAP NetWeaver (Message Server); CVE-2026-76969, credential disclosure in multitenant applications using SAP Cloud Application Programming Model (CAP); and CVE-2026-66768, improper access control in SAP NetWeaver (SAP GUI for Java).

This is not a five minute fix. While you identify systems and spin up regression testing, get others on limiting Internet access to your SAP systems. This is one of those cases where zero trust makes sense: You only want to allow connections from vetted devices by authorized users. And you want layers in front of the application to prevent unwelcome manipulation attempts. Also make sure you're getting logs, including application logs, so your team has a full view of what's going on.

OVERPASS is a striking example of why the order in which security controls execute matters. Roles, user locks, authorization objects, and logon policies can all be perfectly configured and still be irrelevant if attacker-controlled input reaches vulnerable kernel code before authentication happens. Architecturally, remember that controls downstream of the parser cannot protect the parser itself. If attacker-controlled input reaches critical parsing code before authentication, those downstream controls never even get a vote.
SAP
Onapsis
BleepingComputer
The Hacker News
SecurityWeek
Louisiana-based ID verification company IDScan has confirmed that evidence of a data breach was discovered during an investigation that began on September 1, the same day Brian Krebs reported that a dark web site was selling ID document scans belonging to over 170 million people in the US and Canada. Krebs saw signs pointing to IDScan as the possible source for the leaked documents, and the FBI opened an investigation. Upon learning of indications that customer data had been accessed, IDScan secured its systems and engaged third-party specialists to investigate, ultimately determining that information including "full names and driver’s license or other government-issued identification numbers" may have been accessed and/or copied without authorization from customer accounts and the IDScan[.]net cloud. IDScan is reviewing its data security policies and procedures, and is cooperating with federal law enforcement as investigation continues. At the time of this writing, IDScan has not described the timing, nature, or full scope of the breach. The company is notifying potentially impacted customers and offering them free credit monitoring and identity protection services, and the security notice encourages vigilance against suspicious account activity, including taking measures like fraud alerts and credit freezes. As described in NewsBites 28.66, Krebs had observed the site "Nexus" selling scans of over 153 million driver’s licenses (including his own), over 10 million identification cards, over 1.9 million travel documents, over 1.3 million international IDs, more than half a million medical cards, and millions of other official documents.

The good news is we've moved to the notification & offer of ID restoration services part of the incident. The question is, how long until you get your notice, if affected, and what's your risk of waiting until then to have protections in place? Yes, it's nice to have someone else pay the bill, but how expensive will it be to recover if one's identity is stolen? OK, let’s say you're good, but how about the rest of the family? My wife and I have been giving cyber training to seniors recently, and while they understand the risks and consequences, they need a bit of help understanding and getting all this dialed in, as well as comprehending what is trustworthy and not. Be proactive; it's much easier before the call that comes after something bad happens.

I no longer teach people how to protect their privacy, as privacy is literally impossible. Too many organizations are collecting your highly personal data without you realizing it, then selling that data, sharing that data, or in this case losing that data to attackers. Instead, I now teach people how to protect themselves assuming their data is already out there — i.e., how to lock down all of your accounts, how to freeze your credit, and most importantly, how to monitor all your financial accounts, to include daily transaction summaries. Teaching people how to protect their privacy gives them a false sense of control, so I now make sure people understand how that is no longer possible and what they can do about it.

Lance is looking at this from the individual's side: assume a great deal of your identity data is already out there and protect yourself accordingly. Wise advice. From the identity collector's side, last week I wrote that identity verification can become identity accumulation, and this confirmation makes the retention question even harder to ignore. IDScan still has not publicly established that its breach accounts for the entire Nexus dataset, so that distinction matters. But once an identity has been verified, what continuing business need justifies keeping the underlying document or data? Absent a clear legal or business need to retain it, that looks like A LOT more risk than reward to me.

Those who are breached seem to think that free credit monitoring and identity protection services are an appropriate response. However, these services require and create one more copy of sensitive identification information. Those services have not proven to be any more secure than their clients. More copies increase the risk.
IDScan
TechCrunch
The Record
BleepingComputer
The US Federal Bureau of Investigation's (FBI's) Cyber Division has published a Cyber Strategy that "defines [the agency's] priorities, objectives, and framework for countering malicious cyber activity directed at the United States." The Strategy rests on four foundational pillars: (1) Investigate, Disrupt, and Impose Cost on Cyber Adversaries, (2) Support Victims, (3) Increase Impact Through Partnerships, and (4) Enhance FBI's Cyber Capabilities. The Strategy describes the current cyber threat landscape as being "shaped by two overlapping forces: disciplined, state-sponsored actors leveraging national power to penetrate US networks and critical infrastructure for intelligence collection and disruption, and a mature, profit-driven criminal marketplace that industrializes ransomware, fraud, and cryptocurrency theft." The document calls for increasing the cadence of disruptive operations against cyber criminals and the participation of private sector companies. While the FBI has developed cyber strategies in the past, this is the first one to be released publicly.

The idea is to move quickly against adversaries, leveraging partnerships with private companies, striking while the iron is hot. Interestingly, this document doesn't have a classified annex. I suspect individual departments or groups in the FBI will have some classified playbooks, but that makes it much easier to share with industry partners and have everyone on the same page. Leveraging AI in the process isn't a surprise — it's needed to help scale the analysis and response.

I like that "disrupt and impose cost" sits at the front of this strategy. Last week's Sality takedown was a terrific example of what that can look like when government authorities and private-sector technical experts combine their strengths. We spend enormous energy helping victims defend and recover, as we should. I'm glad to see real emphasis on reaching upstream too, making cybercrime harder, riskier, and more expensive for the people doing it. Nice work, folks!

A high priority should be to ensure that scarce resources are applied efficiently.
The role of state governments in protecting critical infrastructure from cyber threats was examined in a report published by The National Association of State Chief Information Officers (NASCIO) and General Dynamics Information Technology (GDIT). The research investigates “how states are expanding whole-of-state cybersecurity models, supporting local governments and special districts and addressing persistent challenges including limited authority, local capacity gaps, unstable funding and vulnerable operational technology." The report indicates that "Whole‑of‑state cybersecurity models” are becoming the primary framework for critical infrastructure cyber resilience, despite wide variations in centralization, authority and maturity, and gaps in funding for critical infrastructure cyber protection (CICP) for local governments and special districts. The report concludes with suggestions for addressing CICP at the state, local, and special district levels. Data for the report were drawn from the 2026 NASCIO State CIO Survey, the 2026 NASCIO-Deloitte Cybersecurity Study and interviews with state CISOs.

Not a lot of surprises here. States appear to be moving to a holistic view of the critical systems in their boundaries, and are getting their arms around protecting them. If you're in the critical infrastructure business, make sure that you're tied to your state’s cyber activities — know what they are doing, make sure they know who you are and what you need, and don't assume they understand the nuances of your OT systems. The trick will be getting funding for cyber protections on the agenda and granted; having the relationship and understanding will facilitate the conversation.

Last week, Project Watershed 250 showed one version of this idea for Texas water utilities. This report makes the broader case. A small local government, water district, or special district cannot realistically build every cyber capability it needs on its own. Lee Neely is exactly right that local operators need relationships with their state cyber teams. From the other side of that relationship, I really appreciate New Jersey CISO Michael Geraghty's point about states earning local trust by following through with useful help. Spot on! Whole-of-state cybersecurity works when local organizations trust the state enough to call, share, and accept help. And then we have to make it durable: build the service, build the trust, and build a funding model that survives the grant cycle.

There is always enough money to do that which must be done. The evidence is that even though remediation is more costly than prevention, we always pay for it. However, there are so many local governments, their prevention varies widely. If this initiative results in closing funding gaps, it will improve our whole-of-state efficiency.
Pennsylvania-based AdaptHealth has released additional information about a June 5, 2026 breach involving the theft of patient data. AdaptHealth filed Form 8-K with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) in July 2026, disclosing that the company was investigating a security incident involving exfiltration of company data. In that filing, AdaptHealth wrote that "the incident was the result of a successful social engineering attack that compromised a user session associated with a third-party contractor," and noted that they had been contacted by a threat actor who claimed to have taken information from AdaptHealth systems. AdaptHealth "confirmed that certain data was exfiltrated from its systems including a stored password file associated with insurance billing; the Company also has confirmed that certain external electronic health record system portals were accessed by the threat actor." In the course of an ongoing investigation, "the Company determined that the incident is material, due to the nature and potential volume of the data that is at risk." More recently, AdaptHealth notified the US Department of Health and Human Services Office for Civil Rights (HHS OCR) that the incident affected 4,115,802 individuals.

Social engineering still works. I'm always blown away by how well it works when observing a social engineering village. Training isn't enough; we all have bad days! Protect your users by rolling our phishing-resistant MFA (it keeps getting easier) as well as other technical protections to mitigate the impact of a successful scam.

Within the world of Security Behavior and Culture, a major trend is shifting from just teaching people how to detect these attacks to reporting these attacks, creating a Human Sensor network. As the field of human security matures, people will become more critical, as they are now the primary attack vector.

Strong authentication is the most efficient measure for resisting social engineering attacks. Contrary to what many believe, it need not be inconvenient. Yesterday I was logging onto an app that automagically found its own one-time password and verified it with no action on my part. While many passkey implementations are not as transparent as they could be, they are more convenient than passwords.
HIPAA Journal
BleepingComputer
SecurityWeek
AdaptHealth
SEC
In a September 8, 2026 Form 8-K filing with the US Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), medical device manufacturer Boston Scientific disclosed that an August 2026 cyberattack on its network "is likely to have a material impact on the Company’s results of operations for the third quarter and full year 2026." Boston Scientific detected the incident on August 25 and filed an initial Form 8-K the following day. The incident disrupted the company's global operations network, impacting manufacturing, order processing, and shipping. The new filing indicates that the company has made progress recovering from the incident, with "substantial restoration of its distribution network, with major distribution centers now processing and shipping customer orders at or above normal operating levels." The specifics of the attack have not been disclosed, and no one has claimed responsibility for the breach. An investigation is ongoing.

Boston Scientific is making great progress on restoring services, and with material impact the pressure will be immense to resume business regardless of the ability to prevent recurrence. In this situation, shareholders and board members worry about the material impact, while you and your IT/cyber team still need to find the root cause, restore services and restore services. Don't let them get pulled off task; make sure you have a communication liaison in place. Stick to your response plan.
It's rare for a public company to admit in an SEC filing that a cyber incident materially disrupted their business, as most deliberately downplay the impact to avoid lawsuits. Since cyber threats target everyone regardless of size, practicing essential cyber hygiene isn't just about stopping breaches; it's your legal defense for proving your security program was "reasonable."
Google has patched two exploited flaws in Chrome, one among 12 security updates with Chrome 152.0.7977.82/.83, and the other among 230 security updates with Chrome 153. Both vulnerabilities carry CVSS score 8.8 and allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox by using a crafted HTML page to exploit flaws in V8 in Google Chrome. CVE-2026-85046, fixed on September 3, does this by exploiting type confusion. This flaw was reported to Google by Salvatore Gulizia, earning a $1,000 bug bounty. CVE-2026-87491, fixed on September 8, exploits an out-of-bounds write. This flaw was reported to Google by Jihyeon Jeong, a research intern at Compsec Lab at Seoul National University, earning a $2,500 bug bounty. Google has not disclosed additional information about the exploitation in the wild, but both flaws have been added to the US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency's Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog (CISA KEV). Plex published an advisory on September 1 urging server owners to update to Plex Media Server 1.43.3 and Plex Desktop 1.115.0 to "address a number of security issues" that as of this writing are still awaiting CVEs and public descriptions. Users with automatic updates turned on should ensure their software is the latest available version. Plex also provides instructions to install the update manually on Windows, macOS, Ubuntu, and Fedora/CentOS, through Docker, on NVIDIA Shield, and on NAS systems, making a special note that users running Plex Media Server on NAS devices may not see the updated version in their package manager and should start by downloading the proper files from the Plex downloads page. A week after the advisory, Shadowserver observed over 36,000 unpatched Plex Media Server instances still exposed to the internet.

Seems like every time I go on the road, I come back to my browsers prompting to restart to finish the update. I'm really glad they restore the tabs and windows pretty reliably, I used to cringe when the IT team would restart my browser and this didn't work. Don't forget the Chromium browsers, and in fact, check all your browsers; don't assume. If you're running a Plex server, verify it got updated. It may take a couple of extra steps for your NAS hosted service. While you're looking, verify automatic updates are on.

We can hope that AI will be used to ensure the quality of new code and to find and repair the vulnerabilities in our legacy code. In the meantime, perhaps it can even be applied to making patching more thorough, timely, and efficient.
Help Net Security
Help Net Security
The Hacker News
SecurityWeek
Plex
BleepingComputer
BleepingComputer
The Hacker News
Earlier this week, Adobe published 10 security bulletins to address more than 170 vulnerabilities across its product lines, including several flaws with critical ratings. CVE-2026-75650, CVSS score 10.0, is an issue of improper neutralization of special elements used in a template engine in Adobe Commerce, and it is being exploited in the wild. Adobe has released a hotfix to address the vulnerability in Adobe Commerce and Magento Open Source. A second bulletin addressing vulnerabilities in Adobe Commerce includes updates addressing additional critical vulnerabilities; the flaws addressed in the second bulletin do not appear to be under active exploitation. Other products affected by critical vulnerabilities include ColdFusion, Photoshop, Illustrator, Animate, Acrobat and Reader, and Campaign Classic. Adobe assigns priority ratings to updates: Priority 1 indicates that the vulnerabilities addressed in the update are either being actively targeted or are likely to be targeted; these updates be installed as soon as possible. Priority 2 indicates that the affected product has historically been at an elevated risk for attack, but there are no known exploits; these updates be installed soon. Priority 3 indicates an update for a product that has not historically been targeted by attackers; these updates should be installed at administrators' discretion. Of the bulletins released this week, three have been designated Priority 1: Adobe Commerce | APSB26-146; Adobe ColdFusion | APSB26-119; and Adobe Campaign Classic | APSB26-142.

These all require applying the update, and there are no workarounds. If you're using hosted Adobe Commerce, you get a pass on that one. Leverage Creative Cloud to push the updates for desktop apps, so all you need to do is make sure they restart to have the updated version. I used to be a fan of curated updates to ensure only the genuine version was deployed, but the update volume is too high for that anymore, so make sure as many as possible happen in an unattended fashion so you can focus on the more impactful issues. Don't forget to check that you're staying on supported current versions; leverage your software inventory, not manual checks.
Adobe has used its Priority Rating system to suggest patch timelines for almost 15 years, but don't lean too heavily on their schedule. Attackers work on their own timeline, and assuming you have days to respond leaves you wide open.
SecurityWeek
Adobe
Adobe
Adobe
Adobe
Adobe
A known vulnerability in WatchGuard Fireware OS for Firebox devices is being exploited in ransomware attacks. The US Cybersecurity and Infrastructure Security Agency (CISA) added the critical out-of-bounds write vulnerability (CVE-2025-14733, CVSS score 9.3) to the Known Exploited Vulnerabilities (KEV) catalog in December 2025. At that time, the vulnerability was flagged as being actively exploited, but the field indicating whether or not the vulnerability was being exploited in ransomware attacks was set to "Unknown." That field was updated earlier this week to "Known," though CISA does not publish alerts when the content of that field changes in KEV entries. Experts urge organizations to patch vulnerabilities added to the KEV sooner rather than later regardless of the ransomware field flag designation. Jacob Krell, senior director of secure AI solutions and cybersecurity at Suzu Labs, notes that in 2025, CISA changed the ransomware field from "Unknown" to "Known" for 59 CVEs; the period of time between the addition of the CVE to the database and the field change ranged from one day to more than three-and-a-half years. According to Krell, "The gap reflects CISA's confirmation timeline. Ransomware operators were almost certainly exploiting this within days of disclosure."

If you have a Firebox firewall, make sure it’s updated. This flaw was announced last year, and in December 2025 there were over 11,000 unpatched firewalls detected; today there are still around 9000. That’s nine months later. Perimeter security fixes need to be at the top of the list, and doubly so if they're providing your VPN. Ransomware gangs are leveraging this RCE flaw, so it matters — get it fixed, then find and fix whatever issue or process delayed the update.

"Unknown" in KEV's ransomware-use field means exactly that: Unknown, not No. Once CISA has already confirmed active exploitation, waiting for that field to flip to "Known" is waiting for retrospective confirmation of potential for compromise. The KEV listing itself should already have driven the remediation urgency.
This vulnerability has sat in the KEV catalog for nine months, making active ransomware tracking largely irrelevant. Every organization using the product should already be patched. If they aren't, they simply aren't exercising a baseline duty of care to protect company assets.
SANS Internet Storm Center StormCast Friday, September 11, 2026
Redtail Analsys (@sans_edu); Checkpoint VPN Patch; Netscaler and Sonicwall Attacks
https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail/10090
Redtail Payload Analysis
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Redtail+Payload+Analysis+Guest+Diary/33326
Checkpoint Critical Security Advisory: VPN Vulnerabilities CVE-2026-85102 and CVE-2026-8510
Cisco Secure Firewall Management Center Software Authentication Bypass Vulnerability
Netscaler ADC Exploit
https://x.com/ethicalhack3r/status/2095480651478663393
Sonicwall SMA1000 Attack
https://hunt.io/blog/sonicwall-sma1000-uk-council-attack
SANS Internet Storm Center StormCast Thursday, September 10, 2026
Proxmox Scans; MSFT Defender, Google Chrome and FortiPAM Vulns
https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail/10088
Scans for Proxmox Servers
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/Scans+for+Proxmox+Servers/33324
Next Nightmare Eclipse Vulnerability
https://github.com/MSNightmare/ShieldCrash/blob/main/README.md
Google Chrome Updates
https://chromereleases.googleblog.com/2026/09/stable-channel-update-for-desktop_0808145027.html
FortiPAM Vulnerability
https://amibeingpwned.com/blog/fortinet-pam-vuln
SANS Internet Storm Center StormCast Wednesday, September 9, 2026
Microsoft, Adobe, Ivanti, Fortinet Patch Tuesday
https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail/10086
September 2026 Microsoft Patch Tuesday
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/September+2026+Microsoft+Patch+Tuesday/33320
Adobe Security Bulletins
https://helpx.adobe.com/security/security-bulletin.html
Security Advisory Ivanti Neurons for ITSM
Fortinet Advisory
https://www.fortiguard.com/psirt/FG-IR-26-174
SANS Internet Storm Center StormCast Tuesday, September 8, 2026
numbat; MicroTik and Magento (Adobe Commerce) 0-Day; N-Able 4th Hotpatch
https://isc.sans.edu/podcastdetail/10084
numbat - AI agent observability
https://isc.sans.edu/diary/numbat+AI+agent+observability/33312
MicroTik SSH 0-Day Exploited
https://mikrotik.com/supportsec/september-2026-vulnerability/
https://cert.pl/en/posts/2026/09/vulnerabilities-in-mikrotik-routeros-actively-exploited/
Adobe Commerce - Magento - 0-Day Exploited
https://sansec.io/research/stylesmuggler-0day
N-Able 4th Hotpatch
My Upcoming Classes
Catch up on recent editions of NewsBites or browse our full archive of expert-curated cybersecurity news.
Survey | The State of AI Security Maturity Benchmark | AI is moving faster than your security controls. Take 10 minutes to shape SANS' benchmark on AI security maturity and see how your program stacks up
Webinar | SANS 2026 Exposure Management Survey Insights: Cyber Exposure at a Crossroads | Wednesday, October 7 | Jonathan Risto
Webinar | DFIR Solutions Track | Thursday, October 15 | Operationalize advanced DFIR tooling, cloud-native investigation techniques, and automation-driven triage.
Webinar | Ransomware Solutions Track | Friday, October 16 | Learn practical strategies for ransomware detection, containment, identity protection, and resilient recovery