homepage
Menu
Open menu
  • Training
    Go one level top Back

    Training

    • Courses

      Build cyber prowess with training from renowned experts

    • Hands-On Simulations

      Hands-on learning exercises keep you at the top of your cyber game

    • Certifications

      Demonstrate cybersecurity expertise with GIAC certifications

    • Ways to Train

      Multiple training options to best fit your schedule and preferred learning style

    • Training Events & Summits

      Expert-led training at locations around the world

    • Free Training Events

      Upcoming workshops, webinars and local events

    • Security Awareness

      Harden enterprise security with end-user and role-based training

    Featured: Solutions for Emerging Risks

    Discover tailored resources that translate emerging threats into actionable strategies

    Risk-Based Solutions

    Can't find what you are looking for?

    Let us help.
    Contact us
  • Learning Paths
    Go one level top Back

    Learning Paths

    • By Focus Area

      Chart your path to job-specific training courses

    • By NICE Framework

      Navigate cybersecurity training through NICE framework roles

    • DoDD 8140 Work Roles

      US DoD 8140 Directive Frameworks

    • By European Skills Framework

      Align your enterprise cyber skills with ECSF profiles

    • By Skills Roadmap

      Find the right training path based on critical skills

    • New to Cyber

      Give your cybersecurity career the right foundation for success

    • Leadership

      Training designed to help security leaders reduce organizational risk

    • Degree and Certificate Programs

      Gain the skills, certifications, and confidence to launch or advance your cybersecurity career.

    Featured

    New to Cyber resources

    Start your career
  • Community Resources
    Go one level top Back

    Community Resources

    Watch & Listen

    • Webinars
    • Live Streams
    • Podcasts

    Read

    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • Internet Storm Center

    Download

    • Open Source Tools
    • Posters & Cheat Sheets
    • Policy Templates
    • Summit Presentations
    • SANS Community Benefits

      Connect, learn, and share with other cybersecurity professionals

    • CISO Network

      Engage, challenge, and network with fellow CISOs in this exclusive community of security leaders

  • For Organizations
    Go one level top Back

    For Organizations

    Team Development

    • Why Partner with SANS
    • Group Purchasing
    • Skills & Talent Assessments
    • Private & Custom Training

    Leadership Development

    • Leadership Courses & Accreditation
    • Executive Cybersecurity Exercises
    • CISO Network

    Security Awareness

    • End-User Training
    • Phishing Simulation
    • Specialized Role-Based Training
    • Risk Assessments
    • Public Sector Partnerships

      Explore industry-specific programming and customized training solutions

    • Sponsorship Opportunities

      Sponsor a SANS event or research paper

    Interested in developing a training plan to fit your organization’s needs?

    We're here to help.
    Contact us
  • Talk with an expert
  • Log In
  • Join - it's free
  • Account
    • Account Dashboard
    • Log Out
  1. Home >
  2. Blog >
  3. Zero Trust Blog Series - Blog 3: Instrumenting for Zero Trust
Ismael Valenzuela
Ismael Valenzuela

Zero Trust Blog Series - Blog 3: Instrumenting for Zero Trust

This is the third in a 4-part series of blogs covering the end-to-end aspects of zero trust.

September 28, 2023

This is the third in a 4-part series of blogs covering the end-to-end aspects of zero trust.

Find the others here:

Blog 1: Adopting a Zero Trust Mindset

Blog 2: Architecting for Zero Trust

Blog 4: Operating for Zero Trust

Instrumenting for Zero Trust

The previous blog in this series introduced some fundamental architectural components associated with a Zero Trust approach to system security and access. Organizations that have a good handle on the location and types of architectural constructs needed to meet their unique Zero Trust needs are ready to start building and configuring to those designs. A large part of Zero Trust Architecture (ZTA) implementations involve the strategic use of purpose-built technologies that specifically address various zero trust components. Instrumenting an enterprise system to achieve specific ZTA objectives can be overwhelming. There is no shortage of tools and technologies touting their ability to deliver Zero Trust. This blog will provide some guidance on the types of technologies and tools that can be deployed across a well-architected system to deliver Zero Trust capabilities.

Mapping Zero Trust Architectures to Enabling Technologies

Upon developing a plan to achieve Zero Trust maturity and establishing an architecture aligned to the organization’s enterprise use cases – it is time to start implementing the appropriate enabling technologies. With so many technologies to choose from, a first step is analyzing potential technologies for each one’s ability to deliver the previously discussed ZTA components and how they integrate with each other. Those include the Policy Engine (PE), Policy Administrators (PA), Policy Decision Points (PDP), and multiple types of Policy Information Points (PIP). The table below aligns various technologies to the Zero Trust elements they support. These elements and capabilities may be delivered by single tools or a combination of tools.

ZTA Component and Supporting Technologies
Policy Engine (PE)A Policy Engine (PE) handles the ultimate decision to grant, deny, or revoke access to a resource for a given subject - delivering continuous trust evaluations in a ZTA environment.
  • Identity Management Solutions
  • Access and Credential Management Technologies Supporting SSO and MFA
  • Federated Identity Solutions
  • Identity Governance Solutions
Policy Administrator (PA)A Policy Administrator (PA) executes the PE’s policy decision by sending commands to the Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) to establish and terminate the communications path between the subject and the resource.
  • Identity Management Solutions
  • Access and Credential Management Technologies Supporting SSO and MFA
  • Federated Identity Solutions
  • Identity Governance Solutions
Policy Decision Point (PDP)

A Policy Decision Point (PDP) makes decision about whether or not to permit a subject to access a resource. A PDP consists of the combined activities of the PE and PA functions

  • Identity Management Solutions
  • Access and Credential Management Technologies Supporting SSO and MFA
  • Federated Identity Solutions
  • Identity Governance Solutions
Policy Enforcement Point (PEP)

The Policy Enforcement Point (PEP) is a data plane component and guards the trust zone that hosts one or more enterprise resources. The PEP handles enabling, monitoring and eventually terminating connections between subjects and enterprise resources.

  • Network Level PEPs such as routers, switches, firewalls, reverse proxies, web application firewalls (WAFs), Software-Defined Networking, etc.
  • Unified Endpoint Management (UEM) Tools
  • Endpoint Access Control Lists (ACLs) via Data Loss Prevention (DLP), Host-Based Firewalls, Data Rights Management or any other Technology Connections Between Subjects and Enterprise Resources
Policy Information Points (PIPs)

Policy Information Points (PIP) collect and deliver important information derived through telemetry and logs generated by supporting components in a system. These include technologies and capabilities that each contribute uniquely to establish maturity.

Identity, Credential and Access Management (ICAM)

The ICAM PIP component includes the strategy, technology and governance for creating, storing, and managing subject (e.g., enterprise user) accounts and identity records and their access to enterprise resources.

  • Identity and Access Management (IAM) Solutions
  • Access and Credential Management Technologies Supporting SSO and MFA
  • Federated Identity Solutions
  • Identity Governance Solutions
Endpoint Detection and Response (EDR)/Endpoint Protection Platform (EPP)

The endpoint protection PIP component includes the strategy, technology and governance to protect endpoints (e.g., servers, desktops, mobile phone, IoT devices and other non-human devices) and their data from threats and attacks as well as protect the enterprise from threats from managed and unmanaged devices.

  • Continuous Diagnostics and Monitoring (CDM) Solutions
  • Application Protection
  • Device Governance, Risk and Compliance (GRC) Solutions
  • Vulnerability and Threat Mitigation Solutions
  • Host Intrusion Prevention and Host-Based Firewalls
  • Malware Protection
  • Data Protection
  • Mobile Device Management (MDM)
Data Security

The data security PIP component includes the policies an enterprise needs to secure access to enterprise resources, as well as the means to protect data at rest and in transit. Data security is a high priority item for government and commercial entities alike, with the government requiring FIPS-validated encryption for all data in transit and at rest in any systems that process federal data.

  • Data Confidentiality
  • Data Integrity
  • Data Availability
  • Data Access Policies
Security Analytics

The security analytics PIP component encompasses all the threat intelligence feeds and continuous traffic/activity monitoring for a hybrid enterprise environment. This component gathers security and behavior analytics about the current state of enterprise assets and continuously monitors those assets to actively respond to threats or malicious activity.

  • Security Incident and Event Management (SIEM) Solutions
  • Network Logging and Activity Logging
  • Traffic Inspection
  • Endpoint Monitoring
  • Threat Intelligence
  • User Behavior Analytics
  • Correlation and Analytics
  • Security Orchestration and Automation (SOAR) Platforms
  • Security Validation Solutions

Without knowledgeable implementation, configuration, and management of cybersecurity tools, those technologies can very easily fail to deliver the value they promise. In addition, cybersecurity tools are often complex and less-than-intuitive to operate. This makes it important to fully understand what capabilities a tool is expected to deliver in the context of Zero Trust. Teams also need to be willing to invest the time and effort required to competently implement each tool - with the full support of expert resources, including independent consultants if necessary, who specialize not only in the technology but also on the security outcomes they need to deliver.

Building a Tools Stack to Deliver Zero Trust Capabilities

The list of cybersecurity tools on the market that contribute to Zero Trust implementations gets longer by the day. It can be tempting to jump into efforts around refreshing a security stack with the latest tools promising Zero Trust results. But before taking drastic steps to rip and replace tools or acquire new (and potentially costly) supplemental tools, the first step is to evaluate and maximize the tools that already exist in the organization’s toolbox.

Maximizing Existing Tools

Most organizations are already equipped with a stack of legacy products and network-centric solutions, often configured in a perimeter centric manner. These products represent a significant resource investment and unrecoverable sunk costs for businesses and government agencies. While it’s true that some legacy solutions may be antiquated or poorly equipped to support the concepts of Zero Trust, it’s also likely that there are some existing tools that can be better leveraged and play an important role when re-imagined for Zero Trust. Most organizations already have some excellent products that simply aren’t configured in an effective way or aren’t being operated to maximize their capabilities.

Beginning with an assessment of the as-is cybersecurity architecture and supporting technologies, teams will need to analyze, re-configure and validate existing technologies to significantly improve their organizations' prevention, detection and response capabilities, augment visibility, reduce attack surface, and even anticipate attacks in innovative ways. Understanding how to leverage an organization’s current infrastructure and incorporating those existing technologies into the Zero Trust plan are the first steps toward building and maintaining a truly defensible security architecture while embarking on the journey towards implementing Zero Trust principles, pillars and capabilities.

Both government and commercial entities can and do expect to fully leverage the tools they already have when embarking on their Zero Trust journey. By applying the knowledge gained in this blog series as well as doing some additional homework to better understand the specific use cases (business needs) and technologies already available to each specific organization – the requirements that must be met with new tools will be targeted and better defined – saving time and money. For those looking to broaden and deepen their skills in this area, SANS offers an excellent course (Defensible Security Architecture and Engineering: Implementing Zero Trust for the Hybrid Enterprise - SEC530)  designed to help organizations leverage both existing and new technologies to build a robust security infrastructure, layer by layer, across hybrid environments as they embark on a journey towards Zero Trust.

Acquiring New Tools to Fill the Gaps

Trying to make the most of an organization’s existing cybersecurity technologies may not be sufficient to achieve all Zero Trust objectives in a plan. Chances are some new technologies will be needed to fill critical Zero Trust gaps. That said, there is no cookbook approach or prescribed one-size-fits-all set of ZTA tools. Even though Zero Trust implementations generally require the deployment of access control policies at a granular level – the exact approach to ZTA that works for each organization must be specifically architected, instrumented and configured to meet their unique use cases. It is incumbent on each cybersecurity team to decide how their system should be best architected and operated – which includes selecting the tools that make the most sense for their organization.

One important consideration for those serving federal agencies is that any tools that will be consumed as a cloud service (e.g., SaaS, PaaS or IaaS) and process or hold federal data must have a FedRAMP Authorization to Operate (ATO). To verify the FedRAMP status of a cloud service offering (CSO), all CSOs with public authorizations are listed in GSA’s FedRAMP Marketplace. Similarly, an increasing number of state and local governments are now requiring StateRAMP authorization before approving the use of CSOs, and adding the tools to their  approved product lists (APLs). In the case of an APL, any newly acquired tools must either be on that list or be added to the list following that government agency’s procedures to do so. Finally, some agencies have very specific requirements around technologies used for system access that may include the use of a DOD-approved Trusted Internet Connection (TIC) and/or the use of a Personal Identity Verification (PIV) or Common Access Cards (CAC cards) as a part of their MFA – all of which must be considered in the selection of Zero Trust technologies.

Additional Resources and Summary

The government has done some additional groundwork related to Zero Trust-enabling tools that may be used as a point of reference for those areas of Zero Trust that cannot be satisfied with an organization’s existing cybersecurity tools stack. The National Cybersecurity Center of Excellence (NCCoE) team at NIST recently published an updated Zero Trust Reference Architecture as part of their special publication on Implementing a Zero Trust Architecture (NIST SP  1800-35B). This document was created with the input of no fewer than 24 vendors, all of whom participated in the document’s development. Each contributing vendor has a technology offering that is relevant to one or more zero trust components. Those offerings are described within, providing a good starting point for organizations just beginning their search for tools to fill their zero trust technology gaps. Finally, the General Services Administration (GSA) has also published a Zero Trust Architecture Buyer’s Guide that maps various technologies to their 8-pillar version of the Zero Trust model (as well as to the ZTA component within the pillar) to help government agencies and those supporting the government make informed decisions about software acquisition.

Before instrumenting an enterprise for Zero Trust, it is important to remember that cybersecurity tools and technologies are only as effective as the competence with which they are implemented, configured and operated. As mentioned in the previous blog in this series, tools deployed in a poorly designed, inadequately architected enterprise system will struggle to deliver the value they promise – leaving IT teams with limited potential to mature their systems along an achievable Zero Trust roadmap. Design for Zero Trust first, then align solutions and technologies - through re-architecting with existing tools and the acquisition of new ones - in a thoughtful, business-prioritized manner. Tools should do more than improve various components of Zero Trust in isolation, rather they need to be implemented in the full context of the Zero Trust plan. That plan maps out the path to Zero Trust and the cyber resilience it affords. Investing in the effort up-front to select and configure the right set of tools to deliver the various Zero Trust components is a critical part of achieving the desired level of Zero Trust maturity.

More to come! Look for the final blog in this series, Blog 4, “Operating for Zero Trust,” which will focus on implementing zero trust operations that support your organization’s business and cases.

Grow Your Zero Trust Competencies with SANS

SANS is pleased to a 6-day course that will equip participants with skills and knowledge to translate the concept of zero trust into actionable steps. Acquired skills will aid in building a robust security infrastructure, layer by layer, across hybrid environments, as you embark on a journey towards Zero Trust.

Course: Defensible Security Architecture and Engineering: Implementing Zero Trust for the Hybrid Enterprise 36 CPEs

This course is designed to help students establish and maintain a holistic and layered approach to security, while taking them on a journey towards a realistic 'less trust' implementation, based on Zero Trust principles, pillars and capabilities. Effective security requires a balance between detection, prevention, and response capabilities, but such a balance demands that controls be implemented on the network, directly on endpoints, and within cloud environments. This course will help your organization:

  • Identify and comprehend deficiencies in security solutions
  • Design and Implement Zero Trust strategies leveraging current technologies and investment
  • Maximize existing investment in security architecture by reconfiguring existing technologies
  • Layer defenses to increase protection time while increasing the likelihood of detection
  • Improved prevention, detection, and response capabilities
  • Reduced attack surface

For course details: https://www.sans.org/cyber-security-courses/defensible-security-architecture-and-engineering/

About SANS

SANS empowers cyber security professionals with the practical skills and knowledge they need to make our world a safer place through high quality training, certifications, scholarship academies, degree programs, cyber ranges, and resources to meet the needs of every cyber professional. Our data, research, and the top minds in cybersecurity collectively ensure that individuals and organizations have the actionable education and support they need.

Share:
TwitterLinkedInFacebook
Copy url Url was copied to clipboard
Subscribe to SANS Newsletters
Receive curated news, vulnerabilities, & security awareness tips
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Spain
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Netherlands
Australia
India
Japan
Singapore
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'ivoire
Croatia (Local Name: Hrvatska)
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard And McDonald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Republic Of
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Macedonia
Northern Mariana Islands
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Bartholemy
Saint Kitts And Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome And Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre And Miquelon
Suriname
Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad And Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks And Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Wallis And Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

By providing this information, you agree to the processing of your personal data by SANS as described in our Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recommended Training

  • LDR512: Security Leadership Essentials for Managers™
  • SEC511: Cybersecurity Engineering: Advanced Threat Detection and Monitoring™
  • SEC549: Cloud Security Architecture

Tags:
  • Security Awareness

Related Content

Blog
n2c blog 340x340.png
Security Awareness, Cybersecurity Leadership, Cloud Security, Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT), Industrial Control Systems Security, Digital Forensics, Incident Response & Threat Hunting, Cybersecurity and IT Essentials, Cyber Defense, Offensive Operations, Pen Testing, and Red Teaming
March 13, 2025
A Visual Summary of SANS New2Cyber Summit 2025
Check out these graphic recordings created in real-time throughout the event for SANS New2Cyber Summit 2025
No Headshot Available
Alison Kim
read more
Blog
Zero Trust - Blog 4: Operating for Zero Trust
Security Awareness
December 7, 2023
Zero Trust Blog Series - Blog 4: Operating for Zero Trust
This is the fourth in a 4-part series of blogs covering the end-to-end aspects of zero trust.
Ismael Valenzuela
Ismael Valenzuela
read more
Blog
Zero Trust Blog 1 Adopting a Zero Trust Mindset
Security Awareness
July 27, 2022
Zero Trust Blog Series - Blog 1: Adopting a Zero Trust Mindset
This is the first in a 4-part series of blogs covering the end-to-end aspects of zero trust.
Ismael Valenzuela
Ismael Valenzuela
read more
  • Company
  • Mission
  • Instructors
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Press
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Policies
  • Training Programs
  • Work Study
  • Academies & Scholarships
  • Public Sector Partnerships
  • Law Enforcement
  • SkillsFuture Singapore
  • Degree Programs
  • Get Involved
  • Join the Community
  • Become an Instructor
  • Become a Sponsor
  • Speak at a Summit
  • Join the CISO Network
  • Award Programs
  • Partner Portal
Subscribe to SANS Newsletters
Receive curated news, vulnerabilities, & security awareness tips
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Spain
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Netherlands
Australia
India
Japan
Singapore
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'ivoire
Croatia (Local Name: Hrvatska)
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard And McDonald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Republic Of
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Macedonia
Northern Mariana Islands
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Bartholemy
Saint Kitts And Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome And Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre And Miquelon
Suriname
Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad And Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks And Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Wallis And Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

By providing this information, you agree to the processing of your personal data by SANS as described in our Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
  • Contact
  • Careers
© 2025 The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc. d/b/a SANS Institute. Our Terms and Conditions detail our trademark and copyright rights. Any unauthorized use is expressly prohibited.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn