SEC595: Applied Data Science and AI/Machine Learning for Cybersecurity Professionals

Experience SANS training through course previews.
Learn MoreLet us help.
Contact usBecome a member for instant access to our free resources.
Sign UpWe're here to help.
Contact UsInternal and External auditors spend a significant amount of time planning their audit processes to align their efforts with the needs of the audited organization. The initial phase of that audit cycle is the risk assessment. Establishing a firm understanding of the likelihood and impact of risk guides the audit function and aligns its work with the risks the organization faces. The challenge many auditors and security professionals face is effectively quantifying the potential impact of a data breach to their organization. This paper compares the data breach cost research of the Ponemon Institute and the RAND Corporation, comparing the models against breach costs reported by publicly traded companies by the Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) reporting requirements. The comparisons will show that the RAND Corporation's approach provides organizations with a more accurate and flexible model to estimate the potential cost of data breaches as they relate to the direct cost of investigating and remediating a breach and the indirect financial impact associated with regulatory and legal action of a data breach. Additionally, the comparison indicates that data breach-related impacts to revenue and stock valuation are only realized in the short-term.