homepage
Menu
Open menu
  • Training
    Go one level top Back

    Training

    • Courses

      Build cyber prowess with training from renowned experts

    • Hands-On Simulations

      Hands-on learning exercises keep you at the top of your cyber game

    • Certifications

      Demonstrate cybersecurity expertise with GIAC certifications

    • Ways to Train

      Multiple training options to best fit your schedule and preferred learning style

    • Training Events & Summits

      Expert-led training at locations around the world

    • Free Training Events

      Upcoming workshops, webinars and local events

    • Security Awareness

      Harden enterprise security with end-user and role-based training

    Featured: Solutions for Emerging Risks

    Discover tailored resources that translate emerging threats into actionable strategies

    Risk-Based Solutions

    Can't find what you are looking for?

    Let us help.
    Contact us
  • Learning Paths
    Go one level top Back

    Learning Paths

    • By Focus Area

      Chart your path to job-specific training courses

    • By NICE Framework

      Navigate cybersecurity training through NICE framework roles

    • DoDD 8140 Work Roles

      US DoD 8140 Directive Frameworks

    • By European Skills Framework

      Align your enterprise cyber skills with ECSF profiles

    • By Skills Roadmap

      Find the right training path based on critical skills

    • New to Cyber

      Give your cybersecurity career the right foundation for success

    • Leadership

      Training designed to help security leaders reduce organizational risk

    • Degree and Certificate Programs

      Gain the skills, certifications, and confidence to launch or advance your cybersecurity career.

    Featured

    New to Cyber resources

    Start your career
  • Community Resources
    Go one level top Back

    Community Resources

    Watch & Listen

    • Webinars
    • Live Streams
    • Podcasts

    Read

    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • Internet Storm Center

    Download

    • Open Source Tools
    • Posters & Cheat Sheets
    • Policy Templates
    • Summit Presentations
    • SANS Community Benefits

      Connect, learn, and share with other cybersecurity professionals

    • CISO Network

      Engage, challenge, and network with fellow CISOs in this exclusive community of security leaders

  • For Organizations
    Go one level top Back

    For Organizations

    Team Development

    • Why Partner with SANS
    • Group Purchasing
    • Skills & Talent Assessments
    • Private & Custom Training

    Leadership Development

    • Leadership Courses & Accreditation
    • Executive Cybersecurity Exercises
    • CISO Network

    Security Awareness

    • End-User Training
    • Phishing Simulation
    • Specialized Role-Based Training
    • Risk Assessments
    • Public Sector Partnerships

      Explore industry-specific programming and customized training solutions

    • Sponsorship Opportunities

      Sponsor a SANS event or research paper

    Interested in developing a training plan to fit your organization’s needs?

    We're here to help.
    Contact us
  • Talk with an expert
  • Log In
  • Join - it's free
  • Account
    • Account Dashboard
    • Log Out
  1. Home >
  2. Blog >
  3. Helping CTI Analysts Approach and Report on Emerging Technology Threats and Trends (Part 1)
John_Doyle_370x370.png
John Doyle

Helping CTI Analysts Approach and Report on Emerging Technology Threats and Trends (Part 1)

How to approach, research, and develop analytic assessments on emerging technologies and threat trends (Part 1)

January 5, 2024

“The human mind tends to see what it expects to see and to overlook the unexpected.

Change often happens so gradually that we do not see it or we rationalize it as not being of fundamental importance until it is too obvious to ignore.

Identification of indicators, signposts, and scenarios create an awareness that prepares the mind to recognize change.”

–The Dutton Institute

Introduction

Cyber Threat Intelligence (CTI) analysts are all too familiar with receiving daunting, perhaps un-scoped or seemingly irrelevant requests from their leadership team. These questions usually take some variation of the question, “I just read/saw on the news/was told about X. Should we care about this?”. X could represent a breaking cyber event; a vendor’s newly published assessment on FUZZYSNUGGLYDUCK; a new technology, trend, security advancement; government policy decisions; or some other flavor du jour. The sheer range of topics this question could cover and the breadth of subject matter expertise required to provide a satisfactory answer makes this cringe-worthy when analysts hear the start of the question…”Hey, I just read this article and was just wondering if…”

However, underpinning this ask is often a sincere inquiry and your leadership team’s implicit endorsement in the caliber of the CTI team, its members, expertise, agility, and adaptability. Part of this is also the unspoken expectation that the CTI team will understand how to answer the should we care about this question, which requires a fair degree of business acumen and understanding organizational priorities. Distilled to its most basic parts, its leadership’s desire to understand whether X would shift the organization’s overall risk posture; whether existing security controls are sufficient to control the risk; what we are doing about X; or if additional investment is required in people, processes, or technologies. One of the trickier topics analysts sometimes struggle to provide adequate answers to is when this question focuses on emerging technologies, advancements, or general adversary trends.

This two-part blog series will focus on assisting CTI analysts in how to approach, research, and develop analytic assessments on emerging technologies and threat trends. This first blog post covers systems analytic thinking to understand the multiple dimensions in which there could be implications for the business to incur additional risk as a result of a new technological advancement or general threat trend. The second blog post will examine a handful of “cyber” advancements over the past decade, how we can use mental models and Structured Analytic Techniques (SATs) to help us frame our response, and other considerations when crafting future oriented analytic assessments.

Emerging Technology Asks are Complex

Emerging technologies are of foremost interest to organizational leadership, but they often realize that they are not the experts on the topic or its implications, so they seek your counsel as the big brains more familiar with the topic. Cyber security leadership, the executive team, the board of directors, and risk management expect that we will provide our opinions on how this X will impact business operations moving forward, change the risk posture and organization's present security or threat model, require additional levels of investment, or otherwise will provide efficiency gains to existing workflows.

The challenge when trying to answer this type of request on any sort of new advancement is that it requires a steep knowledge base not only in cyber security and understanding cyber threat actor tradecraft and trends therein, but also having at least a cursory understanding of broader, multidimensional effects, too. On a micro level, we would call this type of thinking “systems analysis” whereby we seek to understand the various dimensions of a series of systems, the interconnections, dependencies, and relationships between them all. Yet, this systems analytic thinking also acts as a way to help us ground and structure our thoughts. I’ll use the rest of this blog post to provide a perspective on how to begin to answer these types of questions from our leadership team that includes various considerations we should be mindful of like timing the analysis to align with business priorities and how to craft a message that resonates with consumers.

A Common Understanding

Organizations strive to make informed decisions on technology integration, human capital, organizational structure, internal processes, and many other areas to drive down risk to an acceptable level that empowers the organization to pursue its defined mission, vision, and goals. While a fulsome dissection of risk management is outside the scope of this blog post, we provide a high-level understanding in this section to introduce the drivers behind why security operations and cyber threat intelligence exist in the construct of an organization's hierarchy.

Picture1.png

Due to the complexity of the topic, let’s focus on a primary component of risk—and the one that CTI analysts are typically most familiar with—threat. The idea being if we have a strong understanding of the composition of a threat, we can more easily rationalize how it fits into the broader risk context. We can then apply this understanding to advise leadership on various courses of actions it can take to drive threat reduction and ergo reduce risk in kind. So, a natural question arises: with the seemingly ever-increasing number of cyber threats that exist, how can an organization bound its focus to only those cyber threats that are relevant to it?

At its core, organizations can determine relevant cyber threats using a rather straightforward formula defined by three functional inputs: Intent, Capability, and Opportunity.

  • Does the threat actor have the intent or motivation to attempt to compromise your organization?
  • Does the threat actor possess knowledge, skills, abilities, and tools that would allow them to compromise your organization?
  • Does the organization have any exposed attack surface that an adversary can take advantage of to compromise its network.

So where do emerging technologies fit into this equation? Both adversaries and organizations may elect to adopt a new technology into their existing workflows, sometimes for the same reason – to improve efficiency gains or otherwise support execution of an overall mission. Thus, when evaluating the risk of emerging technologies, organizations should consider how the technology presents as a potential adversary capability or increases its exposed attack surface.

Picture2.png

Broadening Our Aperture

Let’s briefly revisit system analysis, which at its core is the process of studying how a system, institution, or business operates; identifying procedural elements; and what internal and external factors could impact the system, institution, or business' operations. This process is important because it helps organizations make decisions to streamline operations, increase efficiency, reduce costs, act on uncertainty (risk), and ultimately achieve their business objectives. Identifying the factors that influence systems analytic decisions, especially as it relates to risk, often leverage threat modeling to enumerate these factors. So where do we start when trying to model potential factors relating to emergent technologies? How can we assist in offering business justification for technological adoption, restricted use, or a decision to outright block usage within a corporate environment?

One approach could involve using existing mental models, templates, and prototypes as a known reference point. Most of us don’t have time to reinvent the wheel, so leveraging known-knowns help us bin, group, and organize relevant information. Threat modeling is no different.

Last month at the Forum of Incident Response and Security Teams (FIRST) CTI Symposium, Natalie Kilber gave a stellar keynote that used the NASA developed Technology Readiness Level framework to determine whether an emergent technology is over-hyped and the timescale in which an emergent technology may become commercially viable. In her talk, Natalie uncoupled technologies into three different categories based on their application—consumer, military, or dual-use—before providing a deeper examination on the quantum cryptography threat. Each of the categories has different development timelines, underlying funding streams, and market viability.

Picture3.png

Figure 1: Natalie's Quantum Threats Assessment

If we perform a more fulsome examination on the categories Natalie identified, we quickly spot similarities and differences impacting drive to market. One additional consideration not noted explicitly thus far is technology refresh cycles and shifts in underpinning technologies. Wholesale shifts in military technology innovation like weapons systems occur at a much slower pace than commercial technology, at a rate of 5-10 years or longer versus  magnanimous shifts in the cyber landscape which happen roughly every 2 years.

  • Consumer technologies are often driven by market forces, mostly the profitability; development costs; identifying existing market competitors and product/service differentiation; target market segment; complexities associated with design, build, and supply chains; and the regulatory landscape. Venture capitalists also look at new technology services and product for “earnings multiplier” potential.
  • Military technology innovation is driven mostly by current and anticipated national security priorities. Existing international relation frameworks like DIMEFIL help us understand some of the various applications of these technologies across a spectrum of elements of national power spanning diplomatic, information, military, economic, financial, intelligence, and law enforcement use cases. This trend has been exacerbated over the past decade by the notion of great power competition.

Picture4.png

Figure 2: DIMEFIL Framework Overview

In late November, Robin Dimyanoglu published a blog post entitled "Geopolitical Cyber Risk: Going Beyond the Industry and Region" that used a DIMEFIL-like framework to create a threat model for a fictious organization. In it, Robin provides organizations with an understanding of how to assess relevant cyber threats using a forecasting system that maps to the motivations, intentions, mission mandate, and priorities of state-sponsored offensive cyber programs. Unto itself, it provides a blueprint that leverages mental models and frameworks to help organizations when creating their own organizational cyber threat profile. Also consider Scott Small and Tidal Cyber’s “Ultimate Guide to Cyber Threat Profiling Assets“ and ENISA’s “Cyber Threat Landscape Development Methodology” when developing an organizational cyber threat profile.

One final illustration I have found particularly handy when it comes to thinking about all the relevant categories to consider when building a threat model—and when communicating the inter-relations—is the following graphic we use in the FOR578 course before students begin a threat modeling lab:

Picture5.png

Figure 3: Illustrative Systems Analytic Categories

Conclusion and Path Forward

While there is no magic bullet solution on how to answer a question about emerging technologies and threat trends, this first blog post hopefully provided some insights and perhaps starting points on the various dimensions to consider when starting your research. The next blog post  will examine a handful of shifts in the “cyber” landscape over the past decade, posit a framework for baselining, identify future oriented SATs that build on our systems analytic dimensions, and cover key considerations on when and how to write the analytic assessment on emerging technologies and threat trends.

Share:
TwitterLinkedInFacebook
Copy url Url was copied to clipboard
Subscribe to SANS Newsletters
Receive curated news, vulnerabilities, & security awareness tips
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Spain
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Netherlands
Australia
India
Japan
Singapore
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'ivoire
Croatia (Local Name: Hrvatska)
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard And McDonald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Republic Of
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Macedonia
Northern Mariana Islands
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Bartholemy
Saint Kitts And Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome And Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre And Miquelon
Suriname
Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad And Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks And Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Wallis And Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

By providing this information, you agree to the processing of your personal data by SANS as described in our Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Recommended Training

  • SEC275: Foundations: Computers, Technology, & Security™
  • FOR608: Enterprise-Class Incident Response & Threat Hunting™
  • FOR528: Ransomware and Cyber Extortion™

Tags:
  • Digital Forensics, Incident Response & Threat Hunting

Related Content

Blog
DFIR blog image.png
Digital Forensics, Incident Response & Threat Hunting
August 22, 2024
A Visual Summary of SANS DFIR Summit 2024
Check out these graphic recordings created in real-time throughout the event for SANS DFIR Summit 2024
No Headshot Available
Alison Kim
read more
Blog
Spring 2024 Update FOR585 Smartphone Forensic Analysis In Depth
Digital Forensics, Incident Response & Threat Hunting
April 26, 2024
Spring 2024 Update: Explore the Latest Enhancements to SANS FOR585: Smartphone Forensic Analysis In-Depth
We are excited to announce the latest update to the SANS Institute's FOR585: Smartphone Forensic Analysis In-Depth!
Heather_Mahalik_370x370.png
Heather Barnhart
read more
Blog
Blog: Google Chrome Platform Notification Analysis
Digital Forensics, Incident Response & Threat Hunting
February 29, 2024
Google Chrome Platform Notification Analysis
In this post, Chad Tilbury uses the new Arsenal Recon LevelDB Recon tool to examine the Chrome Platform Notifications database.
370x370_Chad-Tilbury.jpg
Chad Tilbury
read more
  • Company
  • Mission
  • Instructors
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Press
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Policies
  • Training Programs
  • Work Study
  • Academies & Scholarships
  • Public Sector Partnerships
  • Law Enforcement
  • SkillsFuture Singapore
  • Degree Programs
  • Get Involved
  • Join the Community
  • Become an Instructor
  • Become a Sponsor
  • Speak at a Summit
  • Join the CISO Network
  • Award Programs
  • Partner Portal
Subscribe to SANS Newsletters
Receive curated news, vulnerabilities, & security awareness tips
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Spain
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Netherlands
Australia
India
Japan
Singapore
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'ivoire
Croatia (Local Name: Hrvatska)
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard And McDonald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Republic Of
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Macedonia
Northern Mariana Islands
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Bartholemy
Saint Kitts And Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome And Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre And Miquelon
Suriname
Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad And Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks And Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Wallis And Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

By providing this information, you agree to the processing of your personal data by SANS as described in our Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
  • Contact
  • Careers
© 2025 The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc. d/b/a SANS Institute. Our Terms and Conditions detail our trademark and copyright rights. Any unauthorized use is expressly prohibited.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn