Sorry! The paper Choosing corporate level instant messaging system and implementing audit controls could not be found.
Featuring 6 Papers as of October 26, 2015
Email Acceptable Use: Balancing the Needs of the Organization and the Need to Comply with National Labor Relations Board Rulings Masters
by Paul Hershberger - October 26, 2015
Organizations strive to enact policies that protect intellectual property, including the reputation of their brand, and support a productive work environment, while at the same time respecting employee privacy and freedom of expression. Despite good intentions, organizations sometimes discover that their existing policies suddenly conflict with the legal system. Unexpected legal rulings can arise as authorities assess how technology changes the workplace. What is acceptable policy within an organization one day may be in violation of law the next. This paper examines National Labor Relations Board (NLRB) rulings regarding the use of email by employees for protected purposes such as union organizing and then presents an analysis of the implications of those rulings. Suggestions as to how policies and practices must evolve to meet the needs of the organization are made, while also complying with the NLRB's interpretation of employment law.
Choosing corporate level instant messaging system and implementing audit controls by Mikko Niemelä - September 14, 2010
Instant messaging (IM) is an efficient way of real-time communication that enables messKageye, ffiinlegearnpdrpinrte s=e nAcFe1t9r aFnAs2fe7r 2oFve9r4t h9e98InDte FrDneBt.5B DuEsi3nDes Fs8cBa5n b0e6nEe4fi tAf1ro6m9 4IME4a6s it is a cost-effective alternative for teleconferences by reducing phone call bills, need for meeting rooms and travel. IM systems can be hosted inside a corporate network or hosted off-site. In this paper we present criteria for choosing a suitable IM system and show how to implement reliable audit controls for the IM system using Snort rules.
How to Implement a Content Filtering System by Joshua Dean - March 2, 2004
This paper provides a guide for implementing a content filtering system, along with the basics of an Internet Usage Policy (IUP), installing devices for content filtering, and enforcing policy through disciplinary action.
Acceptable Use: Whose Responsibility Is It? by Patti Lawrence - March 20, 2002
This paper focuses on the Information Technology and Information Security ramifications of acceptable computer use policy and attempts to show how responsibility can be shared with the less technical Human Resources and Legal departments.
Internet Content Filtering by Carol Woody - January 9, 2002
The challenge to all organizations establishing access to the Internet is the inability to limit use of these capabilities to the specific content areas appropriate for the organization.
Attack of the 50-Pixel (Naked) Woman by Ben Malisow - August 18, 2001
The risky nature of downloading untrusted data, sexual harassment issues in the workplace, time wasted by unproductive employees, and simple bandwidth loss are all tangible concerns with associated real financial costs
Most of the computer security white papers in the Reading Room have been written by students seeking GIAC certification to fulfill part of their certification requirements and are provided by SANS as a resource to benefit the security community at large. SANS attempts to ensure the accuracy of information, but papers are published "as is". Errors or inconsistencies may exist or may be introduced over time as material becomes dated. If you suspect a serious error, please contact firstname.lastname@example.org.
All papers are copyrighted. No re-posting or distribution of papers is permitted.