homepage
Menu
Open menu
  • Training
    Go one level top Back

    Training

    • Courses

      Build cyber prowess with training from renowned experts

    • Hands-On Simulations

      Hands-on learning exercises keep you at the top of your cyber game

    • Certifications

      Demonstrate cybersecurity expertise with GIAC certifications

    • Ways to Train

      Multiple training options to best fit your schedule and preferred learning style

    • Training Events & Summits

      Expert-led training at locations around the world

    • Free Training Events

      Upcoming workshops, webinars and local events

    • Security Awareness

      Harden enterprise security with end-user and role-based training

    Featured: Solutions for Emerging Risks

    Discover tailored resources that translate emerging threats into actionable strategies

    Risk-Based Solutions

    Can't find what you are looking for?

    Let us help.
    Contact us
  • Learning Paths
    Go one level top Back

    Learning Paths

    • By Focus Area

      Chart your path to job-specific training courses

    • By NICE Framework

      Navigate cybersecurity training through NICE framework roles

    • DoDD 8140 Work Roles

      US DoD 8140 Directive Frameworks

    • By European Skills Framework

      Align your enterprise cyber skills with ECSF profiles

    • By Skills Roadmap

      Find the right training path based on critical skills

    • New to Cyber

      Give your cybersecurity career the right foundation for success

    • Leadership

      Training designed to help security leaders reduce organizational risk

    • Degree and Certificate Programs

      Gain the skills, certifications, and confidence to launch or advance your cybersecurity career.

    Featured

    New to Cyber resources

    Start your career
  • Community Resources
    Go one level top Back

    Community Resources

    Watch & Listen

    • Webinars
    • Live Streams
    • Podcasts

    Read

    • Blog
    • Newsletters
    • White Papers
    • Internet Storm Center

    Download

    • Open Source Tools
    • Posters & Cheat Sheets
    • Policy Templates
    • Summit Presentations
    • SANS Community Benefits

      Connect, learn, and share with other cybersecurity professionals

    • CISO Network

      Engage, challenge, and network with fellow CISOs in this exclusive community of security leaders

  • For Organizations
    Go one level top Back

    For Organizations

    Team Development

    • Why Partner with SANS
    • Group Purchasing
    • Skills & Talent Assessments
    • Private & Custom Training

    Leadership Development

    • Leadership Courses & Accreditation
    • Executive Cybersecurity Exercises
    • CISO Network

    Security Awareness

    • End-User Training
    • Phishing Simulation
    • Specialized Role-Based Training
    • Risk Assessments
    • Public Sector Partnerships

      Explore industry-specific programming and customized training solutions

    • Sponsorship Opportunities

      Sponsor a SANS event or research paper

    Interested in developing a training plan to fit your organization’s needs?

    We're here to help.
    Contact us
  • Talk with an expert
  • Log In
  • Join - it's free
  • Account
    • Account Dashboard
    • Log Out
  1. Home >
  2. Blog >
  3. Building an Information Security Program Post-Breach Part III
370x370_joe-sullivan.jpg
Joe Sullivan

Building an Information Security Program Post-Breach Part III

It usually takes an incident such as ransomware to change an organization’s focus and approach on how they view security, but where do they start?

October 14, 2020

PART III

Gap Analysis

This is Part II of a 3-part blog series based on MGT514: Security Strategy, Policy, and Leadership.

Read Part I here. Read Part II here.

Now that we have industry standard frameworks to follow, we can focus on getting Rekt Casino secure and operational.

At this point, we have enough information that can be used to establish a strategic plan for security. We’ll now develop the road map to becoming more secure.

We’ll take the data from our postmortem, SWOT Analysis, and PEST Analysis and create a Gap Analysis.

The Gap Analysis is comprised of determining the current state, the desired future state, and changes or initiatives needed to get to the future state.

A Gap Analysis for Rekt Casino would look similar to this:

201014_SullivanBlog_Part3Pic1.png

Figure 9: Gap Analysis

The Gap Analysis approach is to first define the current state, then define the future state of where you would like to go. You then come back to the center of that chart and decide what those initiatives should be.

As you can see from the above Gap Analysis, Rekt has a lot of changes to make to become secure. Also notice that in the left-hand column, we focused specifically on the activities in the NIST CSF.

Decision Matrix Analysis

We now know what needs to be done to become more secure, but where do we start?

That’s where we’ll use a Decision Matrix Analysis to inform how to best approach these new Initiatives.

A Decision Matrix Analysis allows you to rank multiple factors to inform the best decision. For Rekt Casino we will be using the following key factors:

  • Cost: What is the required investment
  • Ability to execute: Does Rekt Casino have the capabilities to execute on it, hire someone, or involve a vendor.
  • Stakeholder Support: Does the organizational leadership support your initiatives?
  • Threat Defense: How does it protect against threats, how effective is it, and does it overlap with other security measures.

We will rank each of these factors from 0-5. The lower the number, the least desirable that factor is.

The resulting Decision Matrix Analysis could look similar to this:

201014_SullivanBlog_Part3Pic2.png

Figure 10: Decision Matrix Analysis

I’ll explain some examples the above Decision Matrix Analysis.

Starting with Advanced EDR:

  • Cost is a 3 which means that the cost isn’t too expensive, but it’s not cheap either.
  • Ability to Execute is a 4 which means that Rekt Casino has the ability to roll out a new endpoint protection product.
  • Stakeholder Support is a 5 which means the business leaders fully support this initiative.
  • Threat Defense is a 4 which means that the new endpoint product will provide a high level of protection.

Let’s skip down to Host based firewalls:

  • Cost is a 5 because there is little cost involved with obtaining host-based firewalls. Rekt Casino is a Windows environment and host-based firewalls are part of the operating system.
  • Ability to Execute is a 1. This means that rolling out host-based firewalls is a difficult process. You need to know which systems are allowed to communicate and on which ports. This will take some time to research, document, and implement. If you roll out host-based firewalls out all at once, there is a high risk you will break something on the network.
  • Stakeholder Support is a 4. The business leaders are bought in on this initiative.
  • Threat Defense is a 5. Implementing host-based firewalls is one of the best controls you can implement on your network. Host-based firewalls prevent access and disrupt lateral movement by attackers.

You’ll notice I’ve added a 5th column called Urgency. This isn’t a column that would normally be present, but in a post-breach scenario there may be a need for immediate technical controls to secure the environment before recovery can begin.

In this scenario the urgent need for Advanced EDR is a 5, because getting it soon is most desirable. The urgent need for host-based firewalls is a 2, because there’s not an immediate need for that during the recovery process. Host-based firewalls can be implemented later down the road.

To determine which initiatives to start with, we’ll sort the totals from highest to lowest in the far-right side column.

The Decision Matrix Analysis dictates we should proceed in the following order:

  1. Advanced EDR
  2. Next generation firewall
  3. Migrate Email to Office 365
  4. Host based firewalls
  5. Create Security Steering Committee
  6. Create policies and procedures in a central library
  7. Create BCP/DR plan
  8. Implement DLP
  9. Implement EUBA
  10. Create infosec team with IR and forensics ability
  11. Hot site failover for virtual infrastructure

If you look at the implementation order, you might be wondering why creating a steering committee, policies and procedures come before DLP (Data Loss Prevention) and UEBA (User and Entity Behavior Analytics).

The reason for that is, part of the policy and procedure process will be data classification and data access permissions. You need to define those to implement DLP correctly.

You also need that before UEBA because part of what UEBA does in the first stage of deployment is establish a baseline of what normal activity looks like. If you don’t have the appropriate baseline permissions, you can’t effectively determine what normal behavior looks like.

Stakeholder Management

Now that the initiatives and order of implementation have been established, you need to think about stakeholder management. All of these initiatives are going to affect a wide range of stakeholders.

It’s important to manage the expectations of stakeholders because they hold key information for your initiatives. Stakeholders can influence the organizational perspective, support you, or block you. Many strategic initiatives have failed due to poor stakeholder management.

We’ll approach stake holder management using two tools, a SIPOC Matrix, and a Power/Interest Grid. SIPOC stands for Suppliers, Inputs, Processes, Outputs, and Customers.

201014_SullivanBlog_Part3Pic3.png

Figure 11: Blank SIPOC Matrix

We will use the SIPOC Matrix above to determine who the stakeholders are for the Advanced EDR initiative:

201014_SullivanBlog_Part3Pic4.png

Figure 12: Completed SIPOC Matrix

  • To complete the SIPOC Matrix we’ll start with the Processes column. This will be the processes required to deploy the Advanced EDR solution.
  • The next column to complete is the Outputs column. The outputs are the results of the processes.
  • We’ll then fill in the Customers column. The customers are the recipients of the outputs. The customers are regarded as stakeholders.
  • Now we’ll proceed to the Inputs column. The inputs are needed to make the processes work.
  • The last column to address is the Suppliers column. The suppliers provide the inputs and are regarded as stakeholders.
  • The stakeholders are now identified by the two columns highlighted in red.

We’ll now map the stakeholders by title in a Power/Interest Grid:

201014_SullivanBlog_Part3Pic5.png

Figure 13: Power/Interest Grid

The left-hand side is the amount of power the stakeholder has. The bottom is amount of interest the stakeholder has.

  • Lower power and interest: The server team and help desk. The server team will build out the virtual infrastructure and the help desk team will respond to support requests. We’ll monitor those two teams for any issues that arise.
  • Lower power and high interest: The end users have lower power over the initiative, but a high interest since it will directly affect the systems they work on every day. We’ll keep the end users informed of the progress and provide training on the new solution.
  • High power and low interest: HR and Legal have a high degree of power over this initiative due to the new solution protecting confidential data and the logs could be used in internal investigations. We’ll attend to their needs during the migration to the new solution.
  • High power and high interest: The CFO, regulators, and head of security have a high degree of interest and power over this initiative. The CFO is concerned over the investment, the regulators want to make sure the solution meets their requirements, the CEO doesn’t want another breach, and the head of security, new to the job, is trying to win organizational trust.

    We’ll manage each of these stakeholders closely, check in frequently, and provide regular updates on the progress of the initiative.

This is a high-level approach to building an information security program in a post-breach scenario. This approach includes the basic steps for building a mature information security program.

SANS MGT514: Security Strategic Planning, Policy, and Leadership goes more in depth how to align your information security program with the goals of the organization and bridge the gap between the technical and business objectives.

This is not a one-size-fits all approach. Depending on the industry you are in the approach needs to be tailored and have the appropriate context applied.

This post is based on a post-breach scenario of an organization that had little in place to start with. If you aren’t in a similar scenario, this approach can be used to improve your existing information security program.

This is Part II of a 3-part blog series based on MGT514: Security Strategy, Policy, and Leadership.

Read Part I here. Read Part II here.

About the Author

Joe Sullivan has over 20 years of experience in information security. Joe is Principal Consultant at Rural Sourcing in Oklahoma City where he manages and develops the security consulting services and the teams that provide them. Over his career Joe has worked in incident response, penetration testing, systems administration, network architecture, forensics, and is a private investigator specializing in computer crime investigations. Joe teaches MGT514: Security Strategic Planning, Policy, and Leadership.

More About Joe






Share:
TwitterLinkedInFacebook
Copy url Url was copied to clipboard
Subscribe to SANS Newsletters
Receive curated news, vulnerabilities, & security awareness tips
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Spain
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Netherlands
Australia
India
Japan
Singapore
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'ivoire
Croatia (Local Name: Hrvatska)
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard And McDonald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Republic Of
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Macedonia
Northern Mariana Islands
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Bartholemy
Saint Kitts And Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome And Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre And Miquelon
Suriname
Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad And Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks And Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Wallis And Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

By providing this information, you agree to the processing of your personal data by SANS as described in our Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.

Tags:
  • Cybersecurity Leadership

Related Content

Blog
emerging threats summit 340x340.png
Digital Forensics, Incident Response & Threat Hunting, Offensive Operations, Pen Testing, and Red Teaming, Cyber Defense, Industrial Control Systems Security, Cybersecurity Leadership
May 14, 2025
Visual Summary of SANS Emerging Threats Summit 2025
Check out these graphic recordings created in real-time throughout the event for SANS Emerging Threats Summit 2025
No Headshot Available
Alison Kim
read more
Blog
LDR - Blog - It’s Dangerous to Go Alone- A Consensus-Driven Approach to SOC Metrics_340 x 340.jpg
Cybersecurity Leadership
April 25, 2025
It’s Dangerous to Go Alone: A Consensus-Driven Approach to SOC Metrics
Metrics play a crucial role in understanding the performance of Security Operations Center (SOC) functions.
Mark-Orlando-370x370.jpg
Mark Orlando
read more
Blog
Cybersecurity Leadership
April 24, 2025
Visual Summary of SANS Cybersecurity Leadership Summit 2025
Check out these graphic recordings created in real-time throughout the event for SANS Cybersecurity Leadership Summit 2025
No Headshot Available
Emily Blades
read more
  • Company
  • Mission
  • Instructors
  • About
  • FAQ
  • Press
  • Contact Us
  • Careers
  • Policies
  • Training Programs
  • Work Study
  • Academies & Scholarships
  • Public Sector Partnerships
  • Law Enforcement
  • SkillsFuture Singapore
  • Degree Programs
  • Get Involved
  • Join the Community
  • Become an Instructor
  • Become a Sponsor
  • Speak at a Summit
  • Join the CISO Network
  • Award Programs
  • Partner Portal
Subscribe to SANS Newsletters
Receive curated news, vulnerabilities, & security awareness tips
United States
Canada
United Kingdom
Spain
Belgium
Denmark
Norway
Netherlands
Australia
India
Japan
Singapore
Afghanistan
Aland Islands
Albania
Algeria
American Samoa
Andorra
Angola
Anguilla
Antarctica
Antigua and Barbuda
Argentina
Armenia
Aruba
Austria
Azerbaijan
Bahamas
Bahrain
Bangladesh
Barbados
Belarus
Belize
Benin
Bermuda
Bhutan
Bolivia
Bonaire, Sint Eustatius, and Saba
Bosnia And Herzegovina
Botswana
Bouvet Island
Brazil
British Indian Ocean Territory
Brunei Darussalam
Bulgaria
Burkina Faso
Burundi
Cambodia
Cameroon
Cape Verde
Cayman Islands
Central African Republic
Chad
Chile
China
Christmas Island
Cocos (Keeling) Islands
Colombia
Comoros
Cook Islands
Costa Rica
Cote D'ivoire
Croatia (Local Name: Hrvatska)
Curacao
Cyprus
Czech Republic
Democratic Republic of the Congo
Djibouti
Dominica
Dominican Republic
East Timor
Ecuador
Egypt
El Salvador
Equatorial Guinea
Eritrea
Estonia
Eswatini
Ethiopia
Falkland Islands (Malvinas)
Faroe Islands
Fiji
Finland
France
French Guiana
French Polynesia
French Southern Territories
Gabon
Gambia
Georgia
Germany
Ghana
Gibraltar
Greece
Greenland
Grenada
Guadeloupe
Guam
Guatemala
Guernsey
Guinea
Guinea-Bissau
Guyana
Haiti
Heard And McDonald Islands
Honduras
Hong Kong
Hungary
Iceland
Indonesia
Iraq
Ireland
Isle of Man
Israel
Italy
Jamaica
Jersey
Jordan
Kazakhstan
Kenya
Kiribati
Korea, Republic Of
Kosovo
Kuwait
Kyrgyzstan
Lao People's Democratic Republic
Latvia
Lebanon
Lesotho
Liberia
Liechtenstein
Lithuania
Luxembourg
Macau
Madagascar
Malawi
Malaysia
Maldives
Mali
Malta
Marshall Islands
Martinique
Mauritania
Mauritius
Mayotte
Mexico
Micronesia, Federated States Of
Moldova, Republic Of
Monaco
Mongolia
Montenegro
Montserrat
Morocco
Mozambique
Myanmar
Namibia
Nauru
Nepal
Netherlands Antilles
New Caledonia
New Zealand
Nicaragua
Niger
Nigeria
Niue
Norfolk Island
North Macedonia
Northern Mariana Islands
Oman
Pakistan
Palau
Palestine
Panama
Papua New Guinea
Paraguay
Peru
Philippines
Pitcairn
Poland
Portugal
Puerto Rico
Qatar
Reunion
Romania
Russian Federation
Rwanda
Saint Bartholemy
Saint Kitts And Nevis
Saint Lucia
Saint Martin
Saint Vincent And The Grenadines
Samoa
San Marino
Sao Tome And Principe
Saudi Arabia
Senegal
Serbia
Seychelles
Sierra Leone
Sint Maarten
Slovakia
Slovenia
Solomon Islands
South Africa
South Georgia and the South Sandwich Islands
South Sudan
Sri Lanka
St. Helena
St. Pierre And Miquelon
Suriname
Svalbard And Jan Mayen Islands
Sweden
Switzerland
Taiwan
Tajikistan
Tanzania, United Republic Of
Thailand
Togo
Tokelau
Tonga
Trinidad And Tobago
Tunisia
Turkey
Turkmenistan
Turks And Caicos Islands
Tuvalu
Uganda
Ukraine
United Arab Emirates
United States Minor Outlying Islands
Uruguay
Uzbekistan
Vanuatu
Vatican City State
Venezuela
Vietnam
Virgin Islands (British)
Virgin Islands (U.S.)
Wallis And Futuna Islands
Western Sahara
Yemen
Zambia
Zimbabwe

By providing this information, you agree to the processing of your personal data by SANS as described in our Privacy Policy.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
  • Privacy Policy
  • Terms and Conditions
  • Do Not Sell/Share My Personal Information
  • Contact
  • Careers
© 2025 The Escal Institute of Advanced Technologies, Inc. d/b/a SANS Institute. Our Terms and Conditions detail our trademark and copyright rights. Any unauthorized use is expressly prohibited.
  • Twitter
  • Facebook
  • Youtube
  • LinkedIn